Volume 34, Issue 7 (October 2023)
Studies in Medical Sciences 2023, 34(7): 373-382 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karami T, Hooshyar H, Seydrezayi H. COMPARISON OF THE OUTCOMES OF INHALATIONAL ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN UNDERGOING INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR UNDER GENERAL ANESTHESIA. Studies in Medical Sciences 2023; 34 (7) :373-382
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5974-en.html
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5974-en.html
Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran (Corresponding Author) , mehdikazempourdizaji@gmail.com
Abstract: (940 Views)
Background &Aim: For hernia surgery and to induce general anesthesia in children, pediatric venipuncture is needed. The venipuncture process in the children can lead to damage (destroy) of the vein due to many reasons, including fear, restlessness and the child's excessive movements. The aim of this study was to compare the results of inhalation anesthesia in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery under general anesthesia.
Materials and Methods: In this randomized, single-blinded, prospective clinical trial study, 70 children aged 2 to 6 years who volunteered for inguinal herniorrhaphy were divided into two groups of 35 people in the children's operating room of Shahid Motahari Medical Training Center in Urmia. In the intervention group, peripheral venous catheterization was performed with induction of inhalation anesthesia by 8% soflurane along with oxygen and nitrous oxide, but in the control group, peripheral venous catheterization was performed without induction of inhalation anesthesia and awake. Randomization of intervention and control groups was done with Random Allocation software. Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of studied variables between two groups. Independent t-test was used to compare the average intensity of restlessness between the two groups. Data analysis was done using SPSS 20 software and the significance level was considered less than 0.05.
Results: The average time of intravenous insertion in the group receiving soflurane was 25.03 ± 21.996 and in the group not receiving soflurane was 254.21 ± 154.913. The difference in the average time of intravenous insertion of the patients in the study between the two groups receiving soflurane and not receiving soflurane was statistically significant, and this average value was much higher in the group not receiving soflurane than in the group receiving soflurane. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the variable of intravenous insertion time (P=0.0001).
Conclusion: Children induced with soflurane need more sedative drugs such as midazolam or combination of midazolam with other drugs. In terms of nausea and vomiting, soflurane has little nausea-causing properties, although is more common in soflurane compared to some drugs such as propofol.
Materials and Methods: In this randomized, single-blinded, prospective clinical trial study, 70 children aged 2 to 6 years who volunteered for inguinal herniorrhaphy were divided into two groups of 35 people in the children's operating room of Shahid Motahari Medical Training Center in Urmia. In the intervention group, peripheral venous catheterization was performed with induction of inhalation anesthesia by 8% soflurane along with oxygen and nitrous oxide, but in the control group, peripheral venous catheterization was performed without induction of inhalation anesthesia and awake. Randomization of intervention and control groups was done with Random Allocation software. Chi-square test was used to compare the frequency of studied variables between two groups. Independent t-test was used to compare the average intensity of restlessness between the two groups. Data analysis was done using SPSS 20 software and the significance level was considered less than 0.05.
Results: The average time of intravenous insertion in the group receiving soflurane was 25.03 ± 21.996 and in the group not receiving soflurane was 254.21 ± 154.913. The difference in the average time of intravenous insertion of the patients in the study between the two groups receiving soflurane and not receiving soflurane was statistically significant, and this average value was much higher in the group not receiving soflurane than in the group receiving soflurane. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the variable of intravenous insertion time (P=0.0001).
Conclusion: Children induced with soflurane need more sedative drugs such as midazolam or combination of midazolam with other drugs. In terms of nausea and vomiting, soflurane has little nausea-causing properties, although is more common in soflurane compared to some drugs such as propofol.
Type of Study: Clinical trials |
Subject:
Anesthesia
References
1. Potts WJ, Riker WL, Lewis JE. The treatment of inguinal hernia in infants and children. Ann Surg 1950;132(3):566. [DOI:10.1097/00000658-195009000-00020] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Boston Children's Hospital. Inguinal hernia [Internet]. [cited 2023 August 1]. Available from: https://www.childrenshospital.org/conditions-and-treatments/conditions /i/inguinal -hernia
3. Chang SJ, Chen JC, Hsu CK, Chuang FC, Yang SD. The incidence of inguinal hernia and associated risk factors of incarceration in pediatric inguinal hernia: a nation-wide longitudinal population-based study. Hernia 2016;20(4):559-63. [DOI:10.1007/s10029-015-1450-x] [PMID]
4. Toki A, Ogura K, Miyauchi A. Ultrasonographic diagnosis of inguinal hernia in children. Pediat Surg Int 1995;10(8):541-3. [DOI:10.1007/BF00566492]
5. Katende G, Mugabi B. Comforting strategies and perceived barriers to pediatric pain management during IV line insertion procedure in Uganda's national referral hospital: A descriptive study. BMC Pediatr 2015;15(1):1-8. [DOI:10.1186/s12887-015-0438-0] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Hasanah I, Mulatsih S, Haryanti F, Haikal Z. Effect of music therapy on cortisol as a stress biomarker in children undergoing IV-line insertion. J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2020;15(3):238-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.03.007] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Moadad N, Kozman K, Shahine R, Ohanian S, Badr LK. Distraction using the BUZZY for children during an IV insertion. J Pediatr Nurs 2016;31(1):64-72. [DOI:10.1016/j.pedn.2015.07.010] [PMID]
8. Bashashati M, McCallum RW. Neurochemical mechanisms and pharmacologic strategies in managing nausea and vomiting related to cyclic vomiting syndrome and other gastrointestinal disorders. Eur J Pharmacol 2014;722:79-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejphar.2013.09.075] [PMID]
9. Wells LT, Rasch DK. Emergence" delirium" after sevoflurane anesthesia: a paranoid delusion?. Anesthesia Analgesia 1999;88(6):1308-10. [DOI:10.1097/00000539-199906000-00020] [PMID]
10. Valley RD, Freid EB, Bailey AG, Kopp VJ, Georges LS, Fletcher J, Keifer A. Tracheal extubation of deeply anesthetized pediatric patients: a comparison of desflurane and sevoflurane. Anesthesia Analgesia. 2003;96(5):1320-4. [DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000058844.77403.16] [PMID]
11. Aono J, Ueda W, Mamiya K, Takimoto E, Manabe M. Greater incidence of delirium during recovery from sevoflurane anesthesia in preschool boys. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 1997;87(6):1298-300. [DOI:10.1097/00000542-199712000-00006] [PMID]
12. Holzki J, Kretz FJ. Changing aspects of sevoflurane in paediatric anaesthesia: 1975-99. [DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9592.1999.00415.x] [PMID]
13. Beskow A, Westrin P. Sevoflurane causes more postoperative agitation in children than does halothane. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1999;43(5):536-41. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.1999.430508.x] [PMID]
14. Jöhr M. Exzitation nach Sevofluran: Ein Problem in der Kinderanästhesie?. Der Anaesthesist 1999;48(12):917-8. [DOI:10.1007/s001010050807] [PMID]
15. Viitanen H, Annila P, Viitanen M, Yli-HankaJa A. Midazolam premedication delays recovery from propofol-induced sevoflurane anesthesia in children 1-3 yr. Can J Anesthesia 1999;46(8):766-71. [DOI:10.1007/BF03013912] [PMID]
16. Sarner JB, Levine M, Davis PJ, Lerman J, Cook RD, Motoyama EK. Clinical characteristics of sevoflurane in children: a comparison with halothane. J Am Soc Anesthesiol 1995;82(1):38-46. [DOI:10.1097/00000542-199501000-00006] [PMID]
17. Driscoll JN1, Bender BM2, Archilla CA2, Klim CM2, Hossain MJ3, Mychaskiw G Nd 4 et all. Comparing incidence of emergence delirium between sevoflurane and desflurane in children following routine otolaryngology procedures. Minerva Anestesiol 2017;83(4):383-91 [DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.16.11362-8] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Hasan AK, Sivasankar R, Nair SG, Hasan WU, Latif Z. Optimum time for intravenous cannulation after induction with sevoflurane, oxygen, and nitrous oxide in children without any premedication. Paediatr Anaesth 2018;28(2):179-83. [DOI:10.1111/pan.13308] [PMID]
19. Yarimoglu R, Basaran B, Korkusuz M, Et T, Bilge A, Toprak H, Kumru N. The optimum time for intravenous cannulation after induction with sevoflurane in children premedicated with dexmedetomidine. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2023;67(1):12-8. [DOI:10.1111/aas.14156] [PMID]
20. Joshi A, Lee S, Pawar D. An optimum time for intravenous cannulation after induction with sevoflurane in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2012;22(5):445-8. [DOI:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03803.x] [PMID]
21. Choudhry D, Stayer S, Schwartz ROY, Pasquariello C. Early intravenous cannulation in children during inhalational induction of anaesthesia. Pediatric Anesthesia 1998;8(2):123-6. [DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9592.1998.00731.x] [PMID]
22. Picard V, Dumont L, Pellegrini M. Quality of recovery in children: sevoflurane versus propofol. Acta anaesthesiologica scandinavica 2000;44(3):307-10. [DOI:10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440315.x] [PMID]
23. Sheikhzade D, Razaghipour M, Seyedhejazi M, Sharabiani BA, Marahem M. A Comparison of the Sevoflurane and Total Intravenous Anesthesia on the Quality of Recovery in 2 to 10-Year-Old Children. Iranian Journal of Pediatrics 2021;31(1). [DOI:10.5812/ijp.105900]
24. McFarlan CS, Anderson BJ, Short TG. The use of propofol infusions in paediatric anaesthesia: a practical guide. Pediatric Anesthesia 1999;9(3):209-16. [DOI:10.1046/j.1460-9584.1999.00364.x] [PMID]
25. Pieters BJ, Penn E, Nicklaus P, Bruegger D, Mehta B, Weatherly R. Emergence delirium and postoperative pain in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a comparison of propofol vs sevoflurane anesthesia. Pediatric Anesthesia 2010;20(10):944-50.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03394.x [DOI:10.1111/j.1460-592.2010.03394.x] [PMID]
26. Naito Y, Tamai S, Shingu K, Fujimori R, Mori K. Comparison between sevoflurane and halothane for paediatric ambulatory anaesthesia. BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia 1991;67(4):387-9. [DOI:10.1093/bja/67.4.387] [PMID]
27. Kim MS, Moon BE, Kim H, Lee JR. Comparison of propofol and fentanyl administered at the end of anaesthesia for prevention of emergence agitation after sevoflurane anaesthesia in children. Br J Anaesth 2013;110(2):274-80. [DOI:10.1093/bja/aes382] [PMID]
28. Pedersen NA, Jensen AG, Kilmose L, Olsen KS. Propofol-remifentanil or sevoflurane for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging? A randomised study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57(8):988-95. [DOI:10.1111/aas.12151] [PMID]
29. Na HS, Song IA, Hwang JW, Do SH, Oh AY. Emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy: a comparison of sevoflurane vs. sevoflurane-remifentanil administration. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2013;57(1):100-5. [DOI:10.1111/aas.12006] [PMID]
30. Bilgen S, Köner Ö, Karacay S, Sancar NK, Kaspar EC, Sözübir S. Effect of ketamine versus alfentanil following midazolam in preventing emergence agitation in children after sevoflurane anaesthesia: a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Int Med Res 2014;42(6):1262-71. [DOI:10.1177/0300060514543039] [PMID]
31. Köner O, Türe H, Mercan A, Menda F, Sözübir S. Effects of hydroxyzine-midazolam premedication on sevoflurane-induced paediatric emergence agitation: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2011;28(9):640-5. [DOI:10.1097/EJA.0b013e328344db1a] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
