Volume 32, Issue 6 (September 2021)                   Studies in Medical Sciences 2021, 32(6): 408-418 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5575-en.html
Assisstant professor, Department of Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran. (Corresponding Author) , k.jabbary@urmia.ac.ir
Abstract:   (1636 Views)
Background & Aims: The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of performance and forecast the Urmia city universities in university rankings based on data from the WOS database.
Materials & Methods: The present study is an applied research based on the research goals and a comparative study in terms of research method. The statistical population consisted of all documents (from 1980 to 11/08/2021) indexed in the WOS database and attributed to "Iran". The criterion for analyzing the outputs was the proposed indicators of Incites.
Results: The results showed that 627972 documents have been indexed in the WOS citation database by scientific organizations affiliated to Iran. Urmia University (with 7442 Documents) has the highest number of documents indexed in the WOS. Urmia University of Technology with regards to the indicators of "citation impact", "% Docs Cited", " % Documents in Top 1% ", " % Documents in Top 10% ", " % Documents in Q1 Journals", and " % International Collaborations" shows the best performance. Urmia University of Medical Sciences shows the best performance in " % Industry Collaborations" and " % Domestic Collaborations" indicators. While the Urmia University shows the best performance in the "% Organization only Collaborations" and “% Corresponding Author (2008-2021)" indicators.
Conclusion: The quality of research conducted in Urmia city universities is not appropriate. Their performance was relatively poor in the international, national, and industrial interactions. It seems that the universities need a good strategy in publishing research findings. Considering all these factors, it can be predicted that their ranking in Iran and worldwide would be weak.
Full-Text [PDF 443 kb]   (509 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Medical Information

1. Vahdatzad M A, Zare BanadKooki M, Owlia M S, Lotfi M M. The Analysis of Iranian Universities Ranking Using the Scientometric Indicators. Iranian Journal of Information Processing and Management2017; 33 (1):117-60. [Google Scholar]
2. Luque-Martínez T, Faraoni N. Meta-ranking to position world universities. Stud in High Educ 2020; 45(4): 819-33. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2018.1564260]
3. Marginson, S., Wan der Wende, M. To Rank or to be ranked: the impact of global rankings in higher education. Journal of studies in international education2007; 11(3,4): 308-13. [DOI:10.1177/1028315307303544]
4. Gringas Y. How to boost your university up the rankings. University World News. 18 July 2014 Issue No: 329. 2014. [URL]
5. Safón V, Docampo D. Analyzing the impact of reputational bias on global university rankings based on objective research performance data: the case of the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU). Scientometrics 2020; 125(3): 2199-27 [DOI:10.1007/s11192-020-03722-z]
6. Shields R. Following the Leader? Network Models of 'World-Class' Universities on Twitter. High Edu 2016; 71 (2): 253-68. [DOI:10.1007/s10734-015-9900-z]
7. Galyani-Moghaddam G, Taheri S. The Position of Iranian Universities in the Selected International Ranking Systems of University, with an emphasis on Allameh Tabatab'i University. Knowl Retr and Semantic Sys 2018; 4(14): 1-31. doi: 10.22054/jks.2018.35427.1196. [Google Scholar]
8. Bejan A., Gunes U, Sahin B. University Rankings: Quality, Size and Permanence. European Review 2020;28(4):537-58. [DOI:10.1017/S106279872000006X]
9. Olcay G. A., Bulu M. Is measuring the knowledge creation of universities possible? A review of university rankings. Technological Forecasting and Social Change2017; 123: 153-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.029]
10. Shin JC, Toutkoushian RK. The past, present, and future of University Rankings. In: Shin JC, Toutkoushian RK, Teichler U, Editors. University Rankings, The Changing Academy: The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective.; 2011. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7]
11. Vidal J, Ferreira C. Universities Under Pressure: The Impact of International University Rankings. Jour of New Appr in Edu Res 2020; 9(2):181-93. [DOI:10.7821/naer.2020.7.475]
12. Rigi A, Azizi N, Pourghaz A. Critically Examine University Management in Achieving top Global Rankings. Man Res 2020; 13(47): 219-43. doi: 10.22111/jmr.2020.32898.4948. [Google Scholar]
13. Fauzi MA, Tan CNL, Daud M, Awalludin MMN. University rankings: A review of methodological flaws. Issues in Edu Res 2020; 30: 79-96. [Google Scholar]
14. Mussard M., James AP. Engineering the global university rankings: Gold standards, limitations and implications. IEEE Access 2018; 6: 6765-76. [DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2789326]
15. Luque-Martínez T S, del Barrio-García S. Constructing a Synthetic Indicator of Research Activity. Scientometrics 2016;108 (3): 1049-64. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-016-2037-8]
16. Vladimirovich N, Nikolayevna I. University rankings as a tool to enhance competitiveness, clustering and transnational governance of higher education in the context of globalization. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research 2013; 16(3): 357-61. [URL]
17. Gnolek SL, Falciano VT, Kuncl RW. Modeling Change and Variation in US News and World Report College Rankings: What Would It Really Take to Be in the Top 20? Res in High Edu 2014; 55 (8): 761-79. [DOI:10.1007/s11162-014-9336-9]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Studies in Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb