Volume 34, Issue 3 (June 2023)
Studies in Medical Sciences 2023, 34(3): 128-138 |
Back to browse issues page
Research code: IR.IAU.B.REC.1401.070
Ethics code: IR.IAU.B.REC.1401.070
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Sajadifar S, Rezakhani S, Behboodi M. PRESENTING A FAMILY FUNCTION PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON BEHAVIORAL BRAIN SYSTEMS IN WOMEN; THE MEDIATING ROLE OF PRIMARY MALADAPTIVE SCHEMAS WITH STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING APPROACH. Studies in Medical Sciences 2023; 34 (3) :128-138
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5961-en.html
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5961-en.html
Assistant Professor, Department of Counseling, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran (Corresponding Author) , rezakhani@riau.ac.ir
Abstract: (1304 Views)
Background & Aim: Family functioning is one of the important indicators that guarantee the health and mental health of the family and its members. Therefore, this research aims to provide a prediction model of family function based on brain-behavioral systems in women; The mediating role of primary incompatible schemas was performed with the structural equation modeling approach.
Materials & Methods: The current research was a descriptive, correlational research based on structural equations. The population studied in this research were all married women who visited cultural centers in the 1st district of Tehran from July to November 2018. 324 married women were selected from the population according to the research variables and using available sampling, and answered the Epstein, Baldwin and Bishop family functioning questionnaires (2003), the short form of Young schema questionnaire (2005), and Carver and White behavioral activation and inhibition system scale (1994). The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS and AMOS software version 21 and using variance inflation factor and tolerance coefficient and a significant level of p<0.05.
Results: Data analysis using structural equation modeling showed that the regression coefficients between behavior inhibition system and family functioning were negatively significant (p<0.01, β=0.167). On the other hand, the total path coefficient between the behavior activating system and family performance was positively significant at the significance level of 0.01 (p<0.01, β=0.262). Also, primary maladaptive schemas negatively predict family functioning (p < 0.01, β= -0.381).
Conclusion: The results showed that the behavioral inhibition system negatively and the behavioral activation system positively and significantly predict family performance. Early maladaptive schemas predict family functioning in female participants.
Materials & Methods: The current research was a descriptive, correlational research based on structural equations. The population studied in this research were all married women who visited cultural centers in the 1st district of Tehran from July to November 2018. 324 married women were selected from the population according to the research variables and using available sampling, and answered the Epstein, Baldwin and Bishop family functioning questionnaires (2003), the short form of Young schema questionnaire (2005), and Carver and White behavioral activation and inhibition system scale (1994). The data were statistically analyzed with SPSS and AMOS software version 21 and using variance inflation factor and tolerance coefficient and a significant level of p<0.05.
Results: Data analysis using structural equation modeling showed that the regression coefficients between behavior inhibition system and family functioning were negatively significant (p<0.01, β=0.167). On the other hand, the total path coefficient between the behavior activating system and family performance was positively significant at the significance level of 0.01 (p<0.01, β=0.262). Also, primary maladaptive schemas negatively predict family functioning (p < 0.01, β= -0.381).
Conclusion: The results showed that the behavioral inhibition system negatively and the behavioral activation system positively and significantly predict family performance. Early maladaptive schemas predict family functioning in female participants.
Keywords: Brain-Behavioral Systems, Early Maladaptive Schemas, Family Functioning, Modeling, Structural Equations
References
1. Jafari harandi R, Eslamiharandi Z. Normalization of Bloom's Family Functioning Questionnaire among married men and women in Isfahan. Cult Strat 2021;14(53):155-82. [Google Scholar]
2. Satir P, Christensen ST. Overview of Structure and Function of Mammalian Cilia. Ann Re Physiol 2017;69(17):377-400. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.physiol.69.040705.141236] [PMID]
3. Minuchin S, Riter M, Borda C. The craft of family therapy: Challenging Certainties. New York: Routledge 2018. [URL]
4. Gatti U, Tremblay RE, Vitaro F, McDuff P. Youth gangs, delinquency and drug use: A test of the selection, facilitation, and enhancement hypotheses. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 2015;46:1178-90. [DOI:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.00423.x] [PMID]
5. Olson D. FACES IV and the circumplex model: Validation study. J Marital Fam Ther 2018; 37 (1): 64-80. [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00175.x] [PMID]
6. Schwartz SJ, Mason CA, Pantin H, Szapocznik J. Longitudinal elationships between family functioning and identity development in hispanic adolescents: Continuity and change. J Early Adolesc 2019;29(2):177-211. [DOI:10.1177/0272431608317605] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Dodge KA, Pettit GS. A biopsychosocial model of the development of chronic conduct problems in adolescence. Dev Psychol 2013;39:349-71. [DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.39.2.349] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Laxton NJ, Dawe S. Alcohol abuse and dysfunction eating in adolescent girls: The influence of individual differences in sensitivity to reward and punishment. International J Eating Dis 2011;29(4):455-62. [DOI:10.1002/eat.1042] [PMID]
9. Fallah Tafti S, Dehghani M, Habibi M, Nikmanesh H. 'Family Functioning, Behavioral Activation System and Problem Behaviors in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Identity', Achiev Clin Psych 2016;1(4):47-66. doi: 10.22055/jacp.2017.12532 [Google Scholar]
10. Vermeersch H, T'sjeon G, Kaufman JM, Van Houtte M. Social Science Theories on Adolescent Risk-Taking, the Relevance of Behavioral Inhibition and Activation. Youth Society 2013;45(1):27-53. [DOI:10.1177/0044118X11409014]
11. Riso LP, Toit PL, Stein DJ, JE Y. Cognitive schemas and core beliefs in psychological problems: A scientistpractitioner guide. Am Psychol Assoc 2007. [DOI:10.1037/11561-000]
12. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide: Guilford Press 2003. [URL]
13. Renner F, Lobbestael J, Peeters F, Arntz A, Huibers M. Early maladaptive schemas in depressed patients: stability and relation with depressive symptoms over the course of treatment. J Affect Disord 2012;136(3):581-90. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2011.10.027] [PMID]
14. Wang CE, Halvorsen M, Eisemann M, Waterloo K. Stability of dysfunctional attitudes and early maladaptive schemas: a 9-year follow-up study of clinically depressed subjects. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2010;41(4):389-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.002 pmid: 20452570. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.002] [PMID]
15. Alimoradi B, Nejat H. Brain Behavioral Systems, Early Maladaptive Schema, and Premenstrual in Mothers with Postpartum Depression Disorder. Iran J Rehab Res 2019;6(2):56-65. URL: http://ijrn.ir/article-1-409-fa.html. [Google Scholar]
16. Epstein NB. Baldwi LM, Bishop DS. The Macmaster model of family assessment device. J Marital Fam Ther 1993; 9(2):171-180. [DOI:10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x]
17. Malekkhosravi Gh. Family functioning in children with ADHD. MSc thesis, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran 2003.
18. Young J. E. Schema therapy for borderline & narcissistic personality disorders. Pittsfield, MA: New England Educational Institute 1998.
19. Sadooghi Z, Aguilar-Vafaie M E, Rasoulzadeh Tabatabaie K, Esfehanian N. Factor Analysis of the Young Schema Questionnaire-Short Form in a Nonclinical Iranian Sample. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci 2008;14(2):214-9 [Google Scholar]
20. Carver CS, White TL. Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994;67(2):319. [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319]
21. Mohammadi N. The Psychometric Properties of the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) and Behavioral Activation System (BAS) scales Among Students of Shiraz University. Clin Psychol Psychother 2008;1(28):61-8. [Google Scholar]
22. Majarshin R. Relation of inhibition and activation system with implicit memory bias in depressive individual. (Dissertation). Tabriz: University of Tabriz 2007. [URL]
23. Chuang CH, Chen SJ, Chuang CW. Human resource management practices and organizational social capital: The role of industrial characteristics. J Bus Res 2013;66(5):678-87. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.04.002]
24. Bilhuber Galli E, Müller-Stewens G. How to build social capital with leadership development: Lessons from an explorative case study of a multibusiness firm. Leadership Q 2021;23(1):176-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.11.014]
25. Young J, Janet K, Weishaar M. Schema Therapy: A Practitioner's Guide. Translated by Hassan Hamidpour and Zahra Andouz. Tehran: Arjmand Publications 2015. [URL]
26. Alikhani M, Naziri Q, Mohammadi M, Aminimanesh S. Developing and Validation of Psycho-educational Package Based on Metaphor to Explain and Conceptualize Schemata in the Domain of Excessive Ringing and Inhibition. Salāmat-I Ijtimāī 2022; 9(4):24-37. [URL]
27. Canal P, Bischetti L, Bertini C, Ricci I, Lecce S, Bambini V. N400 differences between physical and mental metaphors: The role of Theories of Mind. Brain Cognition 2022;161:105879. [DOI:10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105879] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
