Volume 32, Issue 2 (May 2021)
Studies in Medical Sciences 2021, 32(2): 124-133 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghavimi M A, Ghoreishizadeh A, Delirakbari Z, Sadeghi Hassanabadi M, Negahdari R. CLINICAL STUDY OF THE AMOUNT OF PAIN, EDEMA, AND MAXIMUM MOUTH OPENING BEFORE AND AFTER THE BROKEN ZYGOMATIC ARCH REDUCTION BY NEW METHOD OF USING FIFTY MM NEEDLE WITHOUT SURGERY CUT. Studies in Medical Sciences 2021; 32 (2) :124-133
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5393-en.html
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5393-en.html
Mohammad Ali Ghavimi 
, Arezou Ghoreishizadeh , Zahra Delirakbari , Mehdi Sadeghi Hassanabadi , Ramin Negahdari * 
, Arezou Ghoreishizadeh , Zahra Delirakbari , Mehdi Sadeghi Hassanabadi , Ramin Negahdari *
Associate Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Corresponding Author) , m_ghavimi@yahoo.com
Abstract: (2903 Views)
Background & Aims: The zygomatic arch is the most prominent portion of the face and is commonly injured during facial trauma. It articulates with the frontal bone, temporal bone, maxilla, and sphenoid bone, and serves as the main bridge amongst these bones. Isolated arch fractures comprise 10% of all zygomatic fractures and 5% of all facial bone fractures. Treatment of zygomatic arch fractures varies from observation to open reduction. The Gilles temporal approach is a commonly used surgical technique for the reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. However, this surgical approach is associated with a facial scar in the hairline and risks of facial nerve palsy. In this research, we performed a new method using a fifty millimeter needle without surgery cut for replacement of broken zygomatic arch and evaluated the amount of pain, edema, maximum mouth opening, and ecchymosis before and after the surgery.
Materials & Methods: CT scans were taken of all the patients with isolated zygomatic arch fracture who were referred to Imam Reza Medical Center and department of maxillofacial surgery during 2019-20. The 50 mm needle was used for reduction with the new method.
Results: This study was performed on 7 patients with isolated fractures of zygomatic bone. The mean age of patients was 33.85. 5.87 years. Significant reduction in pain was reported during 7 days after surgery, but the rate of edema (p = 0.539) and the amount of mouth opening after surgery did not show a significant difference.
Conclusion: In reviewing the above studies and comparing them with the present study, it was observed that in simple fractures, the surgical method of the present study was a very useful and uncomplicated method in patients. Despite open reduction methods, these methods have a lower scar rate, the duration of surgery is reduced, and this can lead to faster recovery of the patient.
Materials & Methods: CT scans were taken of all the patients with isolated zygomatic arch fracture who were referred to Imam Reza Medical Center and department of maxillofacial surgery during 2019-20. The 50 mm needle was used for reduction with the new method.
Results: This study was performed on 7 patients with isolated fractures of zygomatic bone. The mean age of patients was 33.85. 5.87 years. Significant reduction in pain was reported during 7 days after surgery, but the rate of edema (p = 0.539) and the amount of mouth opening after surgery did not show a significant difference.
Conclusion: In reviewing the above studies and comparing them with the present study, it was observed that in simple fractures, the surgical method of the present study was a very useful and uncomplicated method in patients. Despite open reduction methods, these methods have a lower scar rate, the duration of surgery is reduced, and this can lead to faster recovery of the patient.
Type of Study: Clinical trials |
Subject:
دندانپزشکی(فک و صورت)
References
1. Ahn HC, Youn DH, Choi MSS, Chang J-W, Lee JH. Wire or hook traction for reducing zygomatic fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg2015;16(3):131. [DOI:10.7181/acfs.2015.16.3.131] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Xie L, Shao Y, Hu Y, Li H, Gao L, Hu H. Modification of surgical technique in isolated zygomatic arch fracture repair: seven case studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009;38(10):1096-100. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2009.05.004] [PMID]
3. Starch-Jensen T, Linnebjerg LB, Jensen JD. Treatment of zygomatic complex fractures with surgical or nonsurgical intervention: A retrospective study. Open Dent J 2018;12:377. [DOI:10.2174/1874210601812010377] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Yoon H, Kim J, Chung S, Chung Y-K. Effectiveness of Dual-Maneuver Using K-Wire and Dingman Elevator for the Reduction of Unstable Zygomatic Arch Fracture. Arch Craniofac Surg 2014;15(2):59. [DOI:10.7181/acfs.2014.15.2.59] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Kim JS, Park YJ, Lee YJ, Kim NG, Lee KS. Reduction of zygomatic arch isolated fracture using ultra sound and needle marking. Arch Craniofac Surg 2016;17(4):198. [DOI:10.7181/acfs.2016.17.4.198] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Korkmaz YT, Coskun U, Durmuslar MC, Zor ZF, Hocaoglu TP, Altintas NY. Reduction of isolated zygomatic arch fractures using dental instrument: Report of 2 cases and review of the literature. J Pak Med Assoc2016;66(3):345-7. [Google Scholar]
7. Singh KS, Jayachandran S. A comparative study on the diagnostic utility of ultrasonography with conventional radiography and computed tomography scan in detection of zygomatic arch and mandibular fractures. Contemp Clin Dent 2014;5(2):166. [DOI:10.4103/0976-237X.132306] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Fonseca RJ, Marciani RD, Turvey TA. Oral and maxillofacial surgery. vol Sirsi) i9781416066576. 2009. [URL]
9. Jo T, Kim J. An anthropometric and three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of two-point fixation of zygomatic complex fractures. Arch Plast Surg 2014;41(5):493. [DOI:10.5999/aps.2014.41.5.493] [PMID] [PMCID]
10. Edward J, Samson A, Usha AM, Harikrishnan KU. A Bend to a Needle Makes the Arch Stable" a Modified Technique for Zygomatic Arch Reduction and Stabilization. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2021; 20(1): 160-2. [DOI:10.1007/s12663-020-01334-x] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Cömert E, Cömert A, Uz A, Tuncel Ü, Elhan A. Anatomic basis of percutaneous Kirschner wire insertion in zygoma fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg 2011;22(4):1483-5. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821d1927] [PMID]
12. Czerwinski M, Martin M, Lee C. Quantitative comparison of open reduction and internal fixation versus the Gillies method in the treatment of orbitozygomatic complex fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;115(7):1848-54. [DOI:10.1097/01.PRS.0000165079.36556.57] [PMID]
13. Kang D-H, Jung D-W, Kim Y-H, Kim T-G, Lee J, Chung KJ. Kirschner wire fixation for the treatment of comminuted zygomatic fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg 2015;16(3):119. [DOI:10.7181/acfs.2015.16.3.119] [PMID] [PMCID]
14. Moon S-H, Lee J-H, Oh D-Y, Rhie J-W, Ahn S-T. Reduction of zygomatic fracture segment with intermaxillary fixation screw. J Craniofac Surg 2012;23(3):842-4. [DOI:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dbeb8] [PMID]
15. Uda H, Kamochi H, Sugawara Y, Sarukawa S, Sunaga A. The concept and method of closed reduction and internal fixation: a new approach for the treatment of simple zygoma fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;132(5):1231-40. [DOI:10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a48d8c] [PMID]
16. Béogo R, Bouletreau P, Konsem T, Traoré I, Coulibaly AT, Ouédraogo D. Wire internal fixation: An obsolete, yet valuable method for surgical management of facial fractures. Pan Afr Med J 2014;17:219. [DOI:10.11604/pamj.2014.17.219.3398] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Gündeşlioğlu ÖA, Özen Ç, Inan I, Jasharrlari L, Doldurucu T, Altuntaş Z et al. Closed reduction of zygoma tripod and isolated arch fractures with Volkmann bone hook. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg 2013;23(4):211-6. [DOI:10.5606/kbbihtisas.2013.35467] [PMID]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
