Volume 31, Issue 7 (October 2020)
Studies in Medical Sciences 2020, 31(7): 559-567 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
taheri S, vatan parast F, pourtaji B, nazemi salman B. EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY OF DIGITAL PANORAMIC IMAGES WITH SAFE BEAM EXPOSURE TECHNOLOGY AND MANUAL DOSE ADJUSTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH DIFFERENT BMI: A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY. Studies in Medical Sciences 2020; 31 (7) :559-567
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4937-en.html
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4937-en.html
Assistant Professor of Pedodontics dentistry, Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran (Corresponding Author) , dr.b.nazemi@gmail.com
Abstract: (2528 Views)
Background & Aims: Body Mass Index (BMI) is a factor that affects the quality of panoramic images. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of panoramic digital images with Safe Beam Exposure (SBE) and manual dose adjustment among patients with different BMI levels.
Material & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients, aged 20-60 years who were prescribed panoramic radiography in the course of their treatment were selected randomly as samples. 50% of the subjects were allocated to the manual dose adjustment group and 50% were distributed randomly to the SBE technology group. After grading quality of the images, scores were entered into the SPSS software.
Results: The mean age of participants was 37.96±11.96. 53.5% of participants were women and 46.5% were men. 87% of the samples fell in BMI of 18.5 ≤to ≥30. The overall quality of the images included noise (p=0.0003), contrast (p=0.0001), density (p=0.0002), and resolution (p=0.0003) and anatomical indicators included Laminadora (p= 0.0003), edge sharpness of teeth (p = 0.0002), mandibular canal walls (p = 0.0001), apex end of upper molar teeth (p= 0.0002), and DEJ limit (p= 0.0002). SBE technology in various categories of BMI was better than manual dose adjustment.
Conclusion: SBE technology could be used as a new technology to obtain images with higher quality and better anatomical resolution in various categories of BMI. As BMI decreases, the diagnostic quality of the different anatomical landmarks examined in the panoramic images increases.
Material & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients, aged 20-60 years who were prescribed panoramic radiography in the course of their treatment were selected randomly as samples. 50% of the subjects were allocated to the manual dose adjustment group and 50% were distributed randomly to the SBE technology group. After grading quality of the images, scores were entered into the SPSS software.
Results: The mean age of participants was 37.96±11.96. 53.5% of participants were women and 46.5% were men. 87% of the samples fell in BMI of 18.5 ≤to ≥30. The overall quality of the images included noise (p=0.0003), contrast (p=0.0001), density (p=0.0002), and resolution (p=0.0003) and anatomical indicators included Laminadora (p= 0.0003), edge sharpness of teeth (p = 0.0002), mandibular canal walls (p = 0.0001), apex end of upper molar teeth (p= 0.0002), and DEJ limit (p= 0.0002). SBE technology in various categories of BMI was better than manual dose adjustment.
Conclusion: SBE technology could be used as a new technology to obtain images with higher quality and better anatomical resolution in various categories of BMI. As BMI decreases, the diagnostic quality of the different anatomical landmarks examined in the panoramic images increases.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
رادیولوژی دهان ودندان
References
1. Swell J, Drage N, Brown J. The use of panoramic radiography in a dental accident and emergency department. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001; 30(5): 260-3. [DOI:10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600628]
2. Lee JS, Kang BC. Screening panoramic radiographs in a group of patients visiting a Health Promotion Center. Korean J Oral Maxillofac Radiol 2005; 35(4):199-202. [Google Scholar]
3. Tugnait A, Clerehugh V, Hirschmann PN. The usefulness of radiographs in diagnosis and management of periodontal diseases: a review. Journal of Dentistry 2000; 28(4):219-26. [DOI:10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00062-7]
4. Tafakhori Z, Khazaei M, Afshari Poor A. Accuracy of Digital Panoramic Imaging in Detection of Proximal Caries in Posterior Teeth. Sadra Med Sci J 2016; 4(2): 99-106. [Google Scholar]
5. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. P. 123-31. [URL]
6. Langland OE, Langlais RP, Preece JW. Principles of Dental Imaging. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002. P. 219-58. [Google Scholar]
7. Razi T, Mohammadi A, Ghojazadeh M. Comparison of accuracy of conventional periapical radiography and direct digital subtractions radiography with or without image enhancement in the diagnosis of density changes. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012;6(2):54. [Google Scholar]
8. Kaviani F, Johari M, Esmaeili F. Evaluation of common errors of panoramic radiographs in Tabriz Faculty of Dentistry. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2008;2(3):99. [] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. GoodarziPour D, Saeedi A, Bahrami N. Accuracy of panoramic, panoramic with palpation and tube shift technique to localize maxillary impacted cuspid. J Dent Med Tehran Univ Med Sci 2009; 22(3): 99-105. [Google Scholar]
10. Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Scheer M, Keeve E,et al. The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations onimage quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(3):108-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.05.011] [PMID]
11. WHO EC. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet (London, England) 2004; 363(9403):157-63. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3]
12. EzzodiniArdakani F, Mokhtari N, Moeini M, Ruhi S, Mirhosseini F. Prevalence of Positioning Errors of Digital Panoramic in Patients Referred to Oral and Maxillofacial Radiography Department of Shahid Sadoughi Dentistry School of Yazd. J Shaheed Sadoughi Univ Med Sci 2014; 22 (1):892-8. [Google Scholar]
13. Sakhdari S, MehrAlizadeh S, Zolfaghari M, Madadi M. Age estimation using the pulp of the tooth by digital panoramic radiography. Journal of Islamic Dental Association of Iran 2014; 26(4):260-5. [URL]
14. Sakhdari S, Hassani A, Goodarzi N, Maghsoudi Nejad A. The Accuracy of Dental Panoramic Radiography in Assessment of Position and Root Morphology of Third Molar Teeth. J Res Dent Sci 2012; 9 (2):73-79. [Google Scholar]
15. Gelbrich B, Gelbrich G, Lessig R. Does the quality of dental images depend upon patient's age and sex? Explanations from the forensic sciences. J Forensic Odontostomatol 2009;27(1):2-11. [Google Scholar]
16. Tafakhori Z, Mostafazadeh Gh, Sheikh Fathollahi M. A study on the association of mandible anatomy with age and gender in panoramic radiography of patients referred to Rafsanjan dental school clinic. J Dent Med Tehran Univ Med Sci 2017;29(4):253-61 [Google Scholar]
17. Parissis N, Angelopoulos C, Mantegari S, Karamanis S, Masood F, Tsirlis A. A comparison of panoramic imagequality between a digital radiography storage phosphor system and a film-based system. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11(1): 109-16. [DOI:10.5005/jcdp-11-1-9]
18. Peker I, Toraman AM, Usalan G, Altunkaynak B. The comparison of subjective image quality in conventional and digital panoramic radiography. Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20(1): 21-5. [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.49052] [PMID]
19. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zöller JE. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007;38(9): 234-42. [DOI:10.1259/dmfr/25381129] [PMID]
20. Yalcinkaya S, Künzel A, Willers R, Thoms M, Becker J. Subjective image quality of digitally filtered radiographs acquired by the Dürr Vistascan system compared with conventional radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101(5):643-51. [DOI:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.08.003] [PMID]
21. Ghoncheh Z, Zade BM, Kharazifard MJ. Root morphology of the maxillary first and second molars in an Iranian population using cone beam computed tomography. Journal of dentistry (Tehran, Iran) 2017;14(3):115. [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Mirzadeh E, Osoli M, Salimzadeh H, Arabi M, Navadeh khodadadi S, Haghdoust E. The trend of BMI index over the last 15 years in Iran; systematic review and meta-analysis.Knowledge & Health. Vol 5, Summer 2010: Supplement doi:10.22100/jkh.v5i0.992 [Google Scholar]
23. Hekmatian E, Shah Abuei M, Lashkari Zade Bami M. Evaluation of the relationship between the quality of panoramic radiographs and BMI (body mass index) of patients referring to a dental clinic in Isfahan in 2011. J Isfahan Dent Sch 2012; 7 (5): 810-7. [Google Scholar]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
