Volume 31, Issue 3 (June 2020)                   Studies in Medical Sciences 2020, 31(3): 230-239 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hajebrahimi A, Ali mohammadzadeh K, Hosseini S M, Maher A, Bahadori M. The Different Structures of Healthcare for Prisoners: A Review Study. Studies in Medical Sciences 2020; 31 (3) :230-239
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5112-en.html
Associate Professor, Department of Healthcare Management, School of Management and Social Sciences, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. Health Economics Policy Research Center, Tehran Medical Sciences Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran. (Corresponding Author) , dr_khalil_amz@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3316 Views)
Background & Aims: Health and medical problems of prisoners are health challenges. In an environment where the most important priority is maintaining order, control, and discipline, maintaining health and providing healthcare will have its own challenges. For this reason, some countries have transferred the responsibility for providing health services in prison to the Ministry of Health. We aimed to investigate the developments and changes in providing health services to prisoners and their different structures in different countries.
Materials & Methods: English language articles in Scopus, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were searched. Advanced search options were used, initially based on the titles and keywords. Articles published until September 2019 were included using the following keywords: Prison, Jail, Primary care, Correlational health, Nursing, Prisoners, Health, and Healthcare.
Results: Prison health was addressed not as an independent matter but as part of the duties of the Ministry of Health and the National Health System or the Ministry of Justice in each country. Reports from research carried out in France, Scotland, the Netherlands, Norway, Afghanistan, England-Wales, and New South Wales suggest a fundamental shift in the health care of prisoners in these countries and the process of transferring responsibility from the Ministry of Justice to the Department of Justice are among gained achievements.
Conclusion: The priority of the Department of Justice and the Prisons Organization is to maintain prison rules and regulations, so the quality of work and staff productivity will be greater when the responsibility of providing prison health services is transferred to the Ministry of Health and the National Health System. The opportunity for advanced research and training in this field will also increase.
Full-Text [PDF 245 kb]   (977 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Review article | Subject: General

1. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/249188/Prisons-and-Health.pdf. [URL]
2. Rezvani S, Ramezanzadeh O, S. G. Hygienic and mental rights and medical education of prisoners with relying on medical law of addicted prisoners. Medical Law Journal. 2010;4(15):107-28. [Google Scholar]
3. moradi q, farnia m, jafari s, rahmani k, shahbazi m. Mechanisms to Improve and Promote Methadone Maintenance Therapy in Prisons in Iran: a Qualitative Study. Social health and addiction. 2016;2(6):45-62.
4. Ahalt C, Trestman RL, Rich JD, Greifinger RB, Williams BA. Paying the price: the pressing need for quality, cost, and outcomes data to improve correctional health care for older prisoners. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2013;61(11):2013-9. [DOI:10.1111/jgs.12510] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Coyle A, Fair H. A human rights approach to prison management: Handbook for prison staff: Institute for Criminal Policy Research Birkbeck, University of London; 2018. [URL]
6. Farnia M, Shahbazi M, Moradi G, Alizadeh S, Ebrahi B, Kandi Kalle M. Evaluation of Harm reduction Programs in prisons from the attitude and viewpoint of Iranian prison staff. Journal of School of Public Health and Institute of Public Health Research. 2013;11(1):29-44. [Google Scholar]
7. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/397915/Health_in_prisons_report_online.pdf. [URL]
8. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, Honour MM, Gupta S, Wang S, et al. Primary care physician time utilization before and after implementation of an electronic health record: a time-motion study. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2005;38(3):176-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009] [PMID]
9. Crétenot M, Liaras B. Prison conditions in France. Rome: European Prison Observatory. 2013. [URL]
10. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/99018/E90174.pdf. [URL]
11. Dubois C, Linchet S, Mahieu C, François Reynaert J, Seron P. Organization Models Of Health Care Services In Prisons In Four Countries. Health Services Research; 2017.
12. Available at:http://www.prisonstudies.org/sites/default/files/resources/downloads/prison_health_4.pdf. [URL]
13. Piper M, Forrester A, Shaw J. Prison healthcare services: the need for political courage. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2019:1-3. [DOI:10.1192/bjp.2019.43] [PMID]
14. UNAMA UNAMIA. Assessment of Afghanistan Prison Health Services. 2016. [URL]
15. Méndez JE. Right to a Healthy Prison Environment: Health Care in Custody Under the Prism of Torture. Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law. 2019;9(1):40. [Google Scholar]
16. Lov om vern mot smittsomme sykdommer [smittevernloven. (Norwegian Act relating to control of communicable diseases) available at http://lovdata.no/dokument/NL/lov/1994-08-05-55/KAPITTEL_7#§7-9. [URL]
17. Coyle A. 2. Standards in prison health: the prisoner as a patient. Prisons and Health. 2014:6. [Google Scholar]
18. Fazel S, Baillargeon J. The health of prisoners. The Lancet. 2011;377(9769):956-65. [DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61053-7] [PMID]
19. Aebi MF, Delgrande N. Council of Europe Annual Penal Statistics SPACE I: Survey 2012. Strasbourg: Council of Europe; 2014. [Google Scholar]
20. Verdot C, Godin-Blandeau E, Gremy I, Develay A-E. Monitoring systems and national surveys on prison health in France and abroad. The European Journal of Public Health. 2014;25(1):167-72. [DOI:10.1093/eurpub/cku141] [PMID]
21. Butler B, Murphy J. The impact of policies promoting health information technology on health care delivery in jails and local communities. Health Affairs. 2014;33(3):487-92. [DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.2013.1125] [PMID]
22. Silvestri A. Prison conditions in the United Kingdom. European Prison Observatory Detention Conditions in the European :union: URL: http://www.prisonobservatory.org/upload/PrisonconditionintheUK pdf. 2013. [URL]
23. Organization WH. Good governance for prison health in the 21st century: A policy brief on the organization of prison health. 2013. [URL]
24. Bruce D, Parry B. Integrated care: a Scottish perspective. London journal of primary care. 2015;7(3):44-8. [DOI:10.1080/17571472.2015.11494376] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Minkman M, Ahaus K, Fabbricotti I, Nabitz U, Huijsman R. A quality management model for integrated care: results of a Delphi and Concept Mapping study. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2008;21(1):66-75. [DOI:10.1093/intqhc/mzn048] [PMID]
26. Develay A-E, Verdot C, Grémy I. Monitoring system on prison health: feasibility and recommendations. Santé Publique. 2015;27(4):491-502. [DOI:10.3917/spub.154.0491] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Studies in Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb