Volume 32, Issue 2 (May 2021)                   Studies in Medical Sciences 2021, 32(2): 82-91 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

aghaziarati A, nejati V, borhani K. THE EFFECT OF POSTERIOR CEREBRAL PULMONARY DIRECT ELECTRICAL STIMULATION (TDCS) ON IMPROVING SPATIAL, VISUAL, AND VERBAL PERCEPTUAL ABILITIES. Studies in Medical Sciences 2021; 32 (2) :82-91
URL: http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-5263-en.html
Associate Professor of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author) , v.nejati@sbu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2233 Views)
Background & Aims: Direct electrical stimulation of the brain is a therapeutic technique that can be effective in improving visual, verbal, and spatial perception. The present study investigated the effect of direct electrical stimulation (tDCS) of the posterior parietal cortex on improving spatial, visual, and verbal perceptual abilities.
Materials & Methods: In this quasi-experimental study, the statistical population of the study consisted of all students of Shahid Beheshti University who were studying in the academic year 2017-18. Among them, 30 subjects were selected by purposive non-random sampling and received direct intervention of posterior parietal cortex. Mental rotation test and Parsi abstract reasoning test were used to measure spatial-visual perception and verbal perception. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical methods including one-factor analysis of variance with emphasis on study within the subjects.
Results: The results showed that tDCS of the posterior parietal cortex improves spatial, visual (P <0.01) (F = 19.61) and verbal (P <0.01) (F = 73.91) perceptual abilities.
Conclusion: It is suggested that the results of this study be used in effectiveness and educational programs.
Full-Text [PDF 498 kb]   (1170 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Neuroscience

References
1. Farahbod M. Cure for mental retardation. 2nd Ed. Tehran: joec; 2010. P.104. (Persian)
2. Ortiz R, Estévez A, Muñetón M, Domínguez C. Visual and auditory perception in preschool children at risk for dyslexia. Res Dev Disabil 2015; 35(11): 2673-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.07.007] [PMID]
3. Pittman AL, Lewis DE, Hoover BM, Stelmachowicz PG. perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2005; 4(4), 131-8.
4. Binder J R, Frost J A, Hammeke TA, Cox R W, Rao S M, Prieto T. Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997; 17(1): 353-62. [DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-01-00353.1997] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Haesen B, Boets B, Wagemans J. A review of behavioural and electrophysiological studies on auditory processing and speech perception in autism spectrum disorders. Res Autism Spectr Disord 2016;5(2): 701-14. [DOI:10.1016/j.rasd.2010.11.006]
6. Riskind J H, Kleiman E M, Seifritz E, Neuhoff J. Influence of anxiety, depression and looming cognitive style on auditory looming perception. J Anxiety Disord 2014; 28(1):45-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.janxdis.2013.11.005] [PMID]
7. Vandewalle E, Boets B, Ghesquière P, Zink I. Auditory processing and speech perception in children with specific language impairment: Relations with oral language and literacy skills. Res Dev Disabil 2012; 33(2): 635-44. [DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.11.005] [PMID]
8. Brunoni A R, Ferrucci R, Bortolomasi M, Vergari M, Tadini L, Boggio PS, et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2011;35(1): 96-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.010] [PMID]
9. Liebenthal E, Binder J R, Spitzer S M, Possing E T,Medler D A.Neural substrates of phonemic perception. Cereb Cortex2005; 15: 1621-31. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhi040] [PMID]
10. Hickok null, Poeppel null. Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Apr;4(4):131-8. [DOI:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01463-7]
11. Hsu TY, Tseng P, Liang WK, Cheng SK, Juan CH. Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task. NeuroImage 2016; 98: 306-13. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.069] [PMID]
12. Vandenberg SG, Kuse AR. Mental rotations, a group test of 3-dimensional spatial visualization. Percept Mot Skills 1978; 47: 599-604. [DOI:10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599] [PMID]
13. Peters M, Laeng B, Latham K, Jackson M. A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test: Different versions and factors that affect. Brain Cogn 1995;28(1):39-58. [DOI:10.1006/brcg.1995.1032] [PMID]
14. Nejati V, Ramesh S, Amiri S. Persian Abstract Reasoning Scale: Development and Evaluation of Psychometric Properties. Journal of Analytical - Cognitive Psychology 2017;7(27): 41-50. (Persian)
15. Antal A, Nitsche M A, Paulus W. Transceanial direct current stimulation and the visual cortex. Brain Res Bull2006; 68: 459 - 63. [DOI:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2005.10.006] [PMID]
16. Vicario C M, Rumiari R I. tDCS of the primary motor cortex improves the detection of semantic dissonance. Neurosci Lett2012; 518(2): 133 - 7. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.04.070] [PMID]
17. Demonet J, Thierry G, Cardebat D. Renewal of the neurophysiology of language: Functional neuroimaging. Physiol Rev 2005; 85: 49-95. [DOI:10.1152/physrev.00049.2003] [PMID]
18. Pisoni A, Papagno C, Cattaneo Z. TDCS interferes with Naming of Semantically - related Items. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2010; 6: 231 - 2. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.08.116]
19. Cattaneo Z, Pisoni A, Papagno C. Transcranial direct current stimulation over brocas region improvements Phonemic and semantic fluency in healthy individuals. Neuroscience 2011; 183: 64 - 70. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.03.058] [PMID]
20. Sela T, Ivry RB, Lavidor M.Prefrontal control during a semantic decision task that involves idiom comprehension: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Neuropsychologia 2012; 50: 2271 - 80. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.031] [PMID]
21. Meinze M, Jahnlgen S, David A, Copland D, Grittner U R. Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary. cortex 2016; 50: 137 - 47. [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.07.013] [PMID]
22. Joyal M, Fecteau S. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Semantic Processing in Healthy Individuals. Brain Stimul 2016;9(5):682-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.003] [PMID]
23. Scott S K, Wise R J. PET and fMRI studies of the neural basis of speech perception. Speech Communication 2003; 41: 23-34. [DOI:10.1016/S0167-6393(02)00090-0]
24. Hall D A, Johnsrude I S, Haggard M P, Palmer A R, Akeroyd M A, Summerfield A Q. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 2002; 12: 140-9. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/12.2.140] [PMID]
25. Tian B, Rauschecker J P. Processing of frequency-modulated sounds in the lateral auditory belt cortex of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiology2005; 92: 2993-3013. [DOI:10.1152/jn.00472.2003] [PMID]
26. Zatorre R J,Belin P. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 2008; 11: 946-53. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/11.10.946] [PMID]
27. Joyal M & Fecteau S. Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Effects on Semantic Processing in Healthy Individuals. Brain Stimul 2016;9(5):682-91. [DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.003] [PMID]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Studies in Medical Sciences

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb