<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<journal>
<title>Studies in Medical Sciences</title>
<title_fa>مجله مطالعات علوم پزشکی</title_fa>
<short_title>Studies in Medical Sciences</short_title>
<subject>Medical Sciences</subject>
<web_url>http://umj.umsu.ac.ir</web_url>
<journal_hbi_system_id>37</journal_hbi_system_id>
<journal_hbi_system_user>journal37</journal_hbi_system_user>
<journal_id_issn>2717-008X</journal_id_issn>
<journal_id_issn_online>2717-008X</journal_id_issn_online>
<journal_id_pii></journal_id_pii>
<journal_id_doi>10.61882/umj</journal_id_doi>
<journal_id_iranmedex></journal_id_iranmedex>
<journal_id_magiran></journal_id_magiran>
<journal_id_sid></journal_id_sid>
<journal_id_nlai></journal_id_nlai>
<journal_id_science></journal_id_science>
<language>en</language>
<pubdate>
	<type>jalali</type>
	<year>1404</year>
	<month>3</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<pubdate>
	<type>gregorian</type>
	<year>2025</year>
	<month>6</month>
	<day>1</day>
</pubdate>
<volume>36</volume>
<number>2</number>
<publish_type>online</publish_type>
<publish_edition>1</publish_edition>
<article_type>fulltext</article_type>
<articleset>
	<article>


	<language>en</language>
	<article_id_doi></article_id_doi>
	<title_fa></title_fa>
	<title>Revisiting Scaffold Design Paradigms: From Modulus Matching to Strain Optimization</title>
	<subject_fa>عمومى</subject_fa>
	<subject>General</subject>
	<content_type_fa>نامه به سردبیر</content_type_fa>
	<content_type>Letter to editor</content_type>
	<abstract_fa>&lt;br&gt;
&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div dir=&quot;ltr&quot; style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</abstract_fa>
	<abstract>&lt;span style=&quot;line-height:1;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-family:Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:12pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span aptos=&quot;&quot;&gt;Dear Editor&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size:11pt&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;unicode-bidi:embed&quot;&gt;&lt;span calibri=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;span new=&quot;&quot; roman=&quot;&quot; times=&quot;&quot;&gt;I read with great interest the recent article by Qin et al. introducing a two-stage metamaterial scaffold (TMS) that decouples strength and modulus, achieving an effective stiffness of only 13 MPa while retaining sufficient load-bearing capacity.&lt;u&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[1]&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/u&gt; By enabling &gt;2 % callus strain &lt;i&gt;in vivo&lt;/i&gt;, the TMS activated mechanosensitive calcium channels and HIF-1&amp;alpha; signaling, thereby enhancing both osteogenesis and angiogenesis. This work challenges the conventional &amp;ldquo;modulus-matching&amp;rdquo; paradigm by highlighting mechanical strain as a key driver of bone regeneration.&lt;br&gt;
While the compressive behavior of the TMS is well-characterized, two critical aspects require further clarification. First, many skeletal sites are subject to complex tensile and shear forces, which bone scaffolds must withstand to maintain functionality in physiological conditions; however, the performance of TMS under such loading modes remains unexplored.&lt;u&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[2]&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/u&gt; Second, long-term &lt;i&gt;in vivo&lt;/i&gt; studies are essential to evaluate fatigue resistance, remodeling dynamics, and potential late-stage stress shielding.&lt;u&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[3]&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/u&gt; Previous reports have shown that functionally graded designs can improve fatigue life by up to 30%.&lt;u&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[4]&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/u&gt; In addition, patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling could further optimize strain-targeted scaffold designs by predicting callus strain distribution under realistic physiological loading, as demonstrated in fibular healing studies where case-specific FE models incorporating anatomical geometry significantly improved the accuracy of strain and stress distribution predictions.&lt;u&gt;&lt;sup&gt;[5]&lt;/sup&gt;&lt;/u&gt;&lt;br&gt;
By addressing these points, the TMS approach could be better positioned for translational success. Overall, this study represents a significant step toward strain-optimized scaffold design and provides a valuable foundation for next-generation orthopedic implants.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;</abstract>
	<keyword_fa></keyword_fa>
	<keyword>Metamaterial, Scaffold, orthopedic implants</keyword>
	<start_page>94</start_page>
	<end_page>95</end_page>
	<web_url>http://umj.umsu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-5908-1&amp;slc_lang=en&amp;sid=1</web_url>


<author_list>
	<author>
	<first_name>Erkan</first_name>
	<middle_name></middle_name>
	<last_name>Karatas</last_name>
	<suffix></suffix>
	<first_name_fa></first_name_fa>
	<middle_name_fa></middle_name_fa>
	<last_name_fa></last_name_fa>
	<suffix_fa></suffix_fa>
	<email>erkan.karatas@erzurum.edu.tr</email>
	<code>3700319475328460038023</code>
	<orcid>3700319475328460038023</orcid>
	<coreauthor>Yes
</coreauthor>
	<affiliation>Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum 25100, Turkiye</affiliation>
	<affiliation_fa></affiliation_fa>
	 </author>


</author_list>


	</article>
</articleset>
</journal>
